SMOKING IS SEXY II

სიგარეტის სექსუალურად მომხმარებელთა სურათები II

SMOKING IS SEXY

სიგარეტის სექსუალურად მომხმარებელთა სურათები
SO VERY SEXY...

ROCK IN RIO MADRID 2010

4 ივნისი 2010 წელი, მადრიდი

ადგილი სადაც გაიმართა თანამედროვეობის ერთ-ერთი ყველაზე მაშტაბური რკო ფესტივალი ROCK IN RIO.
ადგილი შესანისნავად იყო შერჩეული, ეს არის მადრიდის გარეუბანში მდებარე საკმაოდ დიდი ტერიტორია რომელიც მოიცავს ატრაქციონებს, მაღაზიებს, სწრაფი კვების ობიექტებს და რათქმაუნდა რამოდენიმე სცენას სახელწოდებით როკის ქალაქი (CIUDAD DEL ROCK).


იმ იღბლიანებს ვისაც ბილეთი ქონდა შეეძლო ორი გზით წასულიყო: 1. საკუთარი ხოდით, 2. სანტიაგო ბერნაბეუსთან და კიდევ სადღაც(არ მახსოვს ზუსტად სად) შეეძლო ხალხს მისვლა და დანიშნულების ადგილამდე ემგზავრათ სპეციალურად ამ შემთხვევისთვის გამოყოფილი ავტობუსებით.

საინტერესო მაისურები გოგონებისთვის :))

Facebook Secretly Sold Your Identity to Advertisers

Facebook's privacy policy says they can provide "any of the non-personally identifiable attributes we have collected" to advertisers. But a new report shows that they actually sent data that can easily be tied to your name.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Facebook (and other sites like MySpace and Xanga) provided to advertisers data "that could be used to find consumers' names and other personal details," in violation of their own privacy policy. This information was the address of the page on which a user clicked a specific ad. The address led directly to a profile, meaning advertisers could easily identify the name (and whatever other data they could see) of the person from whose profile their ad was being clicked. Facebook went furthest, "in some cases signaling which user name was clicking on the ad as well as the user name of the page being viewed. By seeing what ads a user clicked on, an advertiser could tell something about a user's interests."

The Journal's report jumps off a 2009 study that suggested just this kind of personal data "leaking" might be occurring. But this is the first time Facebook actually acknowledged that they shared personally identifiable data with advertisers. Shortly after being contacted by the WSJ, Facebook revamped their code to hide the usernames in URLs.

We already knew that Mark Zuckerberg knows when you're going to break up with your girlfriend. Now imagine that the last time you clicked on that Papa John's Pizza ad, some bored Papa John's advertising exec was looking at a picture of you all flabby on the beach and laughing his ass off.

SOURCE

YOUR BROWSING HISTORY AVAILABLE FOR HACKERS

Real-world Web browser history detection results

For the last six months, this website has served as a tool to teach Internet users about Web browser history detection, which allows any website on the Internet to view the browsing history of most of its viewers.
At the same time, we were analyzing the problem in more detail to determine how many of our visitors were affected by this attack, how difficult it is to scan browsers' histories for visited sites and resources, and how much information can be gathered about most of us in this manner. We're pleased to announce that we'll be presenting our results at the Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2010 workshop on May 20th in Oakland. You can view the full paper, or read on for the highlights.

PENTAGON WANTS TO SPY YOUR NETWORK

Pentagon: If You Don't Let The US Gov't Spy On Your Network, You Place American Lives At Risk

from the moral-panics? dept

The whole "cyberterorrism" fear mongering is being taken to even more extreme levels. At the Strategic Command Cyber Symposium, William Lynn III, the deputy defense secretary apparently told the audience that companies who operate critical infrastructure need to let the US install monitoring equipment or it puts everyone at risk. The NSA has apparently developed a monitoring system called Einstein (I wonder if they paid the license fee), and want to let companies "opt-in" to installing the gov't's system on their own systems, or face the "wild west" and put everyone at risk. This sounds like blatant fear mongering to let the government tap into all sorts of private infrastructure systems. After all, the government has shown, time and time again, that once it gets access to information, it doesn't take those whole "oversight" or "privacy rights" issues particularly seriously.

SOURCE